Carpenter v. U.S. was expected to be one of the most consequential 4th Amendment cases in recent years.  Yet the majority opinion, authored by Justice Kennedy, raised as many questions as it answered.  What do Carpenter, Kennedy’s resignation, and Judge Kavanaugh’s nomination to the Supreme Court portend for future privacy and surveillance decisions by SCOTUS?

April Falcon Doss, Partner, Saul Ewing Arnstein & Lehr LLP
Matthew Tait, Adjunct Professor, University of Texas at Austin School of Law
Laura Donohue, Professor and Director of the Center on National Security and the Law, Georgetown Law also Director of the Center on Privacy & Technology
Justin Danilewitz, Partner, Saul Ewing Arnstein & Lehr LLP

Room 307

Conference Materials

Readings:

Justin Danilewitz
Justin Danilewitz

Partner
Saul Ewing Arnstein & Lehr LLP

Laura Donohue
Laura Donohue

Professor & Director of the Center on National Security & the Law, Georgetown Law
Director of the Center on Privacy & Technology

April Falcon Doss
April Falcon Doss

Partner
Saul Ewing Arnstein & Lehr

Matthew Tait
Matthew Tait

Adjunct Professor
University of Texas at Austin School of Law